Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350940›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2024

Effect of Soundscape Augmentation on Behavioral Symptoms in People With Dementia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Arezoo Talebzadeh, Dick Botteldooren, Pieter Thomas, Steven Stewart, Dominique Van de Velde, Patricia De Vriendt, Paul Devos, Andrea Iaboni

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04809545 (Evaluation of Personalized Soundscape Effects on Persons With Dementia; a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04809545 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Personalized Soundscape Effects on Persons With Dementia; a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2021 to 2022Enrolled33ConditionsDementia, Behavioural and Psychiatric Symptoms of DementiaArmsAcusticare, Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arezoo TalebzadehDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES-Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dick BotteldoorenDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES-Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter ThomasDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES-Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Steven StewartKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dominique Van de VeldeFaculty of Mediciness and Health Care Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Patricia De VriendtFaculty of Mediciness and Health Care Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Paul DevosDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES-Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Andrea IaboniKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-6832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Sound is an important environmental factor that influences the expression of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Recent research on the effect of soundscape has shown promising results in improving environmental impact on people with dementia. However, no controlled studies have aimed to quantify the effects of soundscape intervention on resident outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and impact of a soundscape intervention on people with dementia and behavioral symptoms. Research Design and Methods: Pilot single-blind repeated-measures randomized controlled trial of an augmented soundscape intervention. Participants were people with dementia in a hospital-based specialized dementia unit. Participants were randomized to an augmented soundscape intervention delivered in their room in the morning and evening or treatment as usual, with 2 baseline weeks and 4 weekly post-randomization assessments of the primary and secondary behavioral outcomes. Results: The soundscape intervention was feasible in terms of recruitment, retention, and delivery of the intervention. There were improvements in the neuropsychiatric inventory total scores over time in both groups (-5.89, 95%CI -8.45 to -3.28, Discussion and Implications: In this pilot study, soundscape augmentation was a feasible and effective nonpharmacological approach to reducing resistance to care in people with dementia, although it did not improve neuropsychiatric symptoms more globally. Further studies with larger samples and of longer duration are needed to investigate the long-term effects of augmented sonic environments on people with dementia. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT04809545.

Indexed as

Neuropsychiatric symptomsNonphamacological interventionssound environment

Identifiers

PMID39350940
PMCPMC11441324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.