ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2024
Follitropin Alpha versus Follitropin Beta in IVF/ICSI Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Type of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Medication Given for In Vitro Fertilization Impacts Oocyte Retrieval: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Urinary and Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Supporting Primate Follicular Development In Vitro.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rhFSH) in Infertile Women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Follitropin alpha (Gonal-F) and Follitropin beta (Puregon) on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), defined as the percentage of the number of patients who delivered for the first time in a single ovarian stimulation cycle and the number of patients in all oocyte retrieval cycles. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including 2864 infertile patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with Puregon (group A, n=1313) and Gonal-F (group B, n=1551) was conducted between July 2015 and June 2021 at a university-affiliated reproductive medicine center. Reduce potential confounding factors between groups, propensity scores and multivariable logistic regression analyses were estimated to obtain unbiased estimates of outcomes. The primary outcome was the difference in CLBR between the two groups. Results: Each group identified 1160 individuals after propensity score matching (PSM). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups after PSM. The total gonadotrophin (Gn) dose (2400 vs 2325), p=0.038) and cost of Gn usage (5327.9¥ vs 7547.2¥, p<0.001) between the Puregon and Gonal-F groups were statistically significant. Nevertheless, the pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were comparable after fresh embryo transfer and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Additionally, there was also no difference observed in the primary outcome of CLBR (52.8% vs 55.7%, p=0.169). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the type of Gn was not associated with CLBR (p = 0.912). Conclusion: Gonal-F may be a reasonable option for infertile patients who are hesitant to receive more Gn dosage injections. Furthermore, Puregon can eliminate unneeded anxiety and expenses while also administering more flexibility. Taken together, these findings could well be utilized in everyday clinical practice to better inform patients when deciding on an ovarian stimulation strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.