Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351144›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2024

Case Report: Differences in self-selected pacing in 20, 40, and 60 ironman-distance triathlons: a case study.

Beat Knechtle, Ivan Cuk, Marilia Santos Andrade, Pantelis T Nikolaidis, Katja Weiss, Pedro Forte, Mabliny Thuany

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beat KnechtleMedbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ivan CukFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marilia Santos AndradeDepartment of Physiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pantelis T NikolaidisSchool Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Katja WeissInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pedro ForteResearch Center for Active Living and Wellbeing, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.
Mabliny ThuanyCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Triathletes are pushing their limits in multi-stage Ironman-distance triathlons. In the present case study, we investigated the pacing during 20, 40, and 60 Ironman-distance triathlons in 20, 40, and 60 days, respectively, of one professional IRONMAN® triathlete. Case study: Event 1 (20 Ironman-distance triathlons in 20 days), Event 2 (40 Ironman-distance triathlons in 40 days), and Event 3 (60 Ironman-distance triathlons in 60 days) were analyzed by discipline (swimming, cycling, running, and overall event time), by Deca intervals (10 days of consecutive Ironman-distance triathlons) and additional data (sleep duration, body mass, heart rate in cycling and running). To test differences between Events and Deca intervals within the same discipline, Results: Swimming splits were fastest in Event 1, ( Conclusion: In a professional IRONMAN® triathlete finishing 20, 40, and 60 Ironman-distance triathlons in 20, 40, and 60 days, respectively, split performances and both anthropometrical and physiological changes such as body mass and heart rate differed depending upon the duration of the events.

Indexed as

cyclingmulti-stage triathlonpacingrunningswimming

Identifiers

PMID39351144
PMCPMC11439664

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.