ReviewTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Reproductive and oncologic outcomes in young women with uterine sarcoma undergoing fertility-sparing treatment: a systematic review.
Review in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-term delivery in pregnancy complicated with suspected residual cervical alveolar soft part sarcoma: a case report and literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Review
- Fertility-sparing Management of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumour of Uncertain Malignant Potential: A Case Report.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine sarcomas (US) are rare cancer of possible occurrence even in women of childbearing age. To date, total hysterectomy is the standard treatment in the early stages. The possibilities of carrying out fertility-sparing treatments (FST) to save the fertility of women with unfulfilled reproductive desires are described in the literature, but to date, they can only be considered experimental. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of women with different histological types of US undergoing FST. Design: Systematic review. Data sources and methods: Electronic databases were searched for English-language studies describing FST for US until January 31, 2024. Results: Forty-five papers which met the abovementioned inclusion criteria, were included in the qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the data. A descriptive summary of the results according to the histotype of US was provided. Six hundred forty-one patients of childbearing age with US and undergoing FST. After treatment with FST, 89 (13.9%) disease recurrences and 107 (16.7%) pregnancies were recorded. Conclusion: In selected cases of early-stage US, FST may be proposed. However, the patient must be informed of the real possibility of recurrence and potentially difficult achievement of pregnancy. Additional well-designed prospective studies and clinical trials are needed to address the knowledge gaps and enhance clinical decision-making in this population. Trial registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024509356.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.