ReviewJVS-vascular science2024
Recent advances in proteomic analysis to study carotid artery plaques.
Review in JVS-vascular science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphorylation Modification Characteristics of Liver Injury-Related Proteins inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Proteomic signatures of carotid plaque vulnerability: Proteolysis, inflammation, metabolic reprogramming, and lipid dysregulation.JVS-vascular science · 2026Article
- Proteomic analysis of carotid artery plaques with and without vulnerable features on magnetic resonance angiography with vessel wall imaging: a pilot study.JVS-vascular science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We sought to identify differentially expressed proteins in serum, plasma, and plaque samples of patients with carotid atherosclerotic lesions. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the proteomic profile of serum, plasma, and plaque samples of patients with carotid artery disease. We included full-length peer-reviewed studies of adult humans and reported them using PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the design and content of the articles included in the review was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: We included six peer-reviewed articles reporting protein expression in serum, plasma, or plaque samples from patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Three were single-center cross-sectional studies, two were single-center case-control studies, and one was a single-center cohort study. Thirty-six proteins were found to be expressed differentially when comparing samples from healthy subjects and individuals with diseased carotid vessels and between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery atherosclerotic lesions. Some of these were shown to be related to inflammatory or anti-inflammatory pathways in atherogenesis. CD5L and S100A12 were both found to be upregulated in patients with unstable plaque, the former owing to its anti-inflammatory properties and the latter for its pro-oxidant effects in atherosclerosis. ACTB is involved in cellular structure and integrity and was found to be downregulated in patients with ruptured carotid plaques. Conclusions: Atherosclerotic carotid disease places the patient at increased risk of ischemic neurological events. Proteomics may help to understand their pathophysiological processes and can identify differential protein expression in blood samples from healthy subjects and patients with carotid artery plaques. This patient-centered approach will allow for the timely identification of individuals at higher risk of experiencing stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.