Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39351782›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2024

Antibodies in neurological diseases: Established, emerging, explorative.

Lucie Y Li, Amelya Keles, Marie A Homeyer, Harald Prüss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucie Y LiDepartment of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8098-1977
Amelya KelesDepartment of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-2740
Marie A HomeyerDepartment of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-3857
Harald PrüssDepartment of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-7976

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Connect-Generate 01GM1908DDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 504745852;grantsFOR3004,PR1274/5-1,andPR1274/9-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Clinical Research Unit KFO 5023 BECAUSE-Y; projectHelmholtz Association of German Research Centres HIL-A03 BaoBab
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within a few years, autoantibodies targeting the nervous system resulted in a novel disease classification. For several of them, which we termed 'established', direct pathogenicity has been proven and now guides diagnostic pathways and early immunotherapy. For a rapidly growing number of further anti-neuronal autoantibodies, the role in disease is less clear. Increasing evidence suggests that they could contribute to disease, by playing a modulating role on brain function. We therefore suggest a three-level classification of neurological autoantibodies according to the degree of experimentally proven pathogenicity and strength of clinical association: established, emerging, explorative. This may facilitate focusing on clinical constellations in which autoantibody-mediated mechanisms have not been assumed previously, including autoimmune psychosis and dementia, cognitive impairment in cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases. Based on recent data reviewed here, humoral autoimmunity may represent an additional "super-system" for brain health. The "brain antibody-ome", that is, the composition of thousands of anti-neuronal autoantibodies, may shape neuronal function not only in disease, but even in healthy aging. Towards this novel concept, extensive research will have to elucidate pathogenicity from the atomic to the clinical level, autoantibody by autoantibody. Such profiling can uncover novel biomarkers, enhance our understanding of underlying mechanisms, and identify selective therapies.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesNervous System DiseasesAnimalsAutoimmunityBiomarkersBrainHumansNeuronsAutoantibodiesBiomarkersautoimmune dementiaautoimmune encephalitisbrain antibody‐omehuman monoclonal antibodiesNMDARsmoldering autoimmunity

Identifiers

PMID39351782
PMCPMC11659937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.