Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352128›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2024

Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy for Crohn's disease: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.

Lakshmi Thangavelu, Syam Mohan, Hassan A Alfaifi, Abdullah Farasani, Soumya V Menon, Pooja Bansal, Chhavi Choudhary, M Ravi Kumar, Raghav Vashishth, Afrah M A Al-Rihaymee and 10 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Lakshmi ThangaveluCenter for Global health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, India.
Syam MohanSubstance Abuse and Toxicology Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan A AlfaifiPharmaceutical Care Administration (Jeddah Second Health Cluster), Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah FarasaniDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Soumya V MenonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Pooja BansalDepartment of Allied Healthcare and Sciences, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Chhavi ChoudharyChandigarh Pharmacy College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, India.
M Ravi KumarDepartment of Chemistry, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Raghav VashishthDepartment of Surgery, NIMS University, Jaipur, India.
Afrah M A Al-RihaymeeAnesthesia Techniques Department, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon, Iraq.
Sarvesh RustagiSchool of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Anil K MalhotraGraphic Era Institute of Medical Sciences, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Clement Town, Dehradun, India.
Muhammed ShabilUniversity Center for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Mahalaqua N KhatibDivision of Evidence Synthesis, Global Consortium of Public Health and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education, Wardha, India.
Quazi S ZahiruddinSouth Asia Infant Feeding Research Network (SAIFRN), Division of Evidence Synthesis, Global Consortium of Public Health and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education, Wardha, India.
Siddig I AbdelwahabMedical Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Ganesh BushiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0397-7904
Saleh H A AlmasabiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Hayam A AlrasheedDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali A RabaanMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrohn's disease is a chronic, relapsing form of inflammatory bowel disease marked by severe gastrointestinal inflammation and a broad range of debilitating symptoms. Despite advances in medical treatments, achieving sustained remission remains challenging for many patients. This umbrella review aims to consolidate evidence from various systematic reviews to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stem cell therapies in treating Crohn's disease.

methodsThis review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library covered records up to 20 April 2024. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses on stem cell therapy for Crohn's disease were considered. Data were extracted and analyzed for clinical efficacy indicators like remission induction and safety metrics, including adverse events and mortality rates.

resultsSixteen systematic reviews were included, spanning studies conducted between 2009 and 2023. Stem cell therapy showed a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.299 (95% CI: 1.192-1.420) for clinical remission, indicating a 29.9% increased likelihood of remission compared to controls. The pooled RR for healing perianal Crohn's disease was 1.358 (95% CI: 1.13-1.631), suggesting a 35.8% increased likelihood of healing. A pooled RR of 1.481 (95% CI: 1.036-2.116) shows a 48.1% higher immediate fistula closure rate with stem cell therapy. For long-term outcomes, a RR of 1.422 (95% CI: 1.091-1.854) indicates a 42.2% increased likelihood of maintaining closure. However, stem cell therapy did not significantly impact Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (RR: 1.154, 95% CI: 0.193-6.883) and Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) scores (mean difference at 12 weeks: -0.505, 95% CI: -2.481 to 1.471; mean difference at 24 weeks: -0.338, 95% CI: -1.638 to 0.963). The safety profile was comparable to conventional therapies, with a pooled RR of 0.972 (95% CI: 0.739-1.278) for adverse events and 1.136 (95% CI: 0.821-1.572) for serious adverse events.

conclusionStem cell therapy offers significant progress in treating Crohn's disease, particularly in complex cases, by improving fistula closure rates and suggesting potential as a supplementary therapy. Its safety profile aligns with conventional treatments, yet ongoing clinical trials are crucial to optimize its use. Continual research will enable healthcare providers to tailor more effective treatment strategies for this challenging condition.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseStem Cell TransplantationHumansRemission InductionSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39352128
PMCPMC11634090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.