Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354106›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Genomic selection for agronomical phenotypes using genome-wide SNPs and SVs in pearl millet.

Haidong Yan, Yarong Jin, Haipeng Yu, Chengran Wang, Bingchao Wu, Chris Stephen Jones, Xiaoshan Wang, Zheni Xie, Linkai Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Accessing crop genetic diversity via pangenomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Development of Genome-Wide SSR Markers inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haidong YanCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yarong JinCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Haipeng YuDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Chengran WangCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Bingchao WuCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Chris Stephen JonesFeed and Forage Development, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Xiaoshan WangCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zheni XieCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Linkai HuangCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China. huanglinkai@sicau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-4852

Funding

CARS CARS-34Modern Agricultural Industry System Sichuan Forage Innovation Team SCCXTD-20201-16Opening Foundation of Sichuan Province Engineering Research Center for Powder Metallurgy, Chengdu University 2021YFYZ0013Opening Foundation of Sichuan Province Engineering Research Center for Powder Metallurgy, Chengdu University 24GJHZ0303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pearl millet is an essential crop worldwide, with noteworthy resilience to abiotic stress, yet the advancement of its breeding remains constrained by the underutilization of molecular-assisted breeding techniques. In this study, we collected 1,455,924 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and 124,532 structural variant (SV) markers primarily from a pearl millet inbred germplasm association panel consisting of 242 accessions including 120 observed phenotypes, mostly related to the yield. Our findings revealed that the SV markers had the capacity to capture genetic diversity not discerned by SNP markers. Furthermore, no correlation in heritability was observed between SNP and SV markers associated with the same phenotype. The assessment of the nine genomic prediction models revealed that SV markers performed better than SNP markers. When using the SV markers as the predictor variable, the genomic BLUP model achieved the best performance, while using the SNP markers, Bayesian methods outperformed the others. The integration of these models enabled the identification of eight candidate accessions with high genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) across nine phenotypes using SNP markers. Four candidate accessions were identified with high GEBV across 22 phenotypes using SV markers. Notably, accession 'P23' emerged as a consistent candidate predicted based on both SNP and SV markers specifically for panicle number. These findings contribute valuable insights into the potential of utilizing both SNP and SV markers for genomic prediction in pearl millet breeding. Moreover, the identification of promising candidate accessions, such as 'P23', underscores the accelerated prospects of molecular breeding initiatives for enhancing pearl millet varieties.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPennisetumPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBayes TheoremGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotypeSelection, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.