ArticleScientific reports2024
Role of inter- and extra-lesion tissue, transfer learning, and fine-tuning in the robust classification of breast lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A generalist biomedical vision-language model via multi-CLIP knowledge distillation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification and establishment of diagnostic model in breast cancer diagnosis with automated breast ultrasound.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Breast Ultrasound AI Under Dataset Shift: A Patient-Leakage-Aware Benchmark.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a multistage transfer learning framework for robust medical image analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Data-Efficient Machine Learning Approach for Breast Ultrasound Lesion Classification Integrating Image-Derived Features and Sonographic Descriptors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep multi-task learning framework for gastrointestinal lesion-aided diagnosis and severity estimation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Very Early-Stage Breast Cancer in BI-RADS 3 Lesions of Large Population with Deep Learning.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Breast Lesion Detection Using Weakly Dependent Customized Features and Machine Learning Models with Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and unbiased classification of breast lesions is pivotal for early diagnosis and treatment, and a deep learning approach can effectively represent and utilize the digital content of images for more precise medical image analysis. Breast ultrasound imaging is useful for detecting and distinguishing benign masses from malignant masses. Based on the different ways in which benign and malignant tumors affect neighboring tissues, i.e., the pattern of growth and border irregularities, the penetration degree of the adjacent tissue, and tissue-level changes, we investigated the relationship between breast cancer imaging features and the roles of inter- and extra-lesional tissues and their impact on refining the performance of deep learning classification. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in considering the features extracted from the tissue inside the tumor (by performing an erosion operation) and from the lesion and surrounding tissue (by performing a dilation operation) for classification. This study uses these new features and three pre-trained deep neuronal networks to address the challenge of breast lesion classification in ultrasound images. To improve the classification accuracy and interpretability of the model, the proposed model leverages transfer learning to accelerate the training process. Three modern pre-trained CNN architectures (MobileNetV2, VGG16, and EfficientNetB7) are used for transfer learning and fine-tuning for optimization. There are concerns related to the neuronal networks producing erroneous outputs in the presence of noisy images, variations in input data, or adversarial attacks; thus, the proposed system uses the BUS-BRA database (two classes/benign and malignant) for training and testing and the unseen BUSI database (two classes/benign and malignant) for testing. Extensive experiments have recorded accuracy and AUC as performance parameters. The results indicate that the proposed system outperforms the existing breast cancer detection algorithms reported in the literature. AUC values of 1.00 are calculated for VGG16 and EfficientNet-B7 in the dilation cases. The proposed approach will facilitate this challenging and time-consuming classification task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.