Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354466›Full record

Observational studyNutrition journal2024

The EAT-Lancet diet associated cardiovascular health parameters: evidence from a Brazilian study.

Rosa Sá de Oliveira Neta, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima, Maria Fernanda Araújo de Medeiros, David Bruno Melo Araújo, Nicole Bernardi, Armando Augusto Noberto Galdino de Araújo, Michelle Cristine Medeiros Jacob, Adélia da Costa Pereira de Arruda Neta, Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni, Clélia de Oliveira Lyra and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrition journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Associations Between the Cardiovascular Health Diet Index (CHDI) and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Brazilian Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rosa Sá de Oliveira NetaPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. rosa.sa.oliveira@ufrn.br.ORCID 0000-0002-5383-6472
Severina Carla Vieira Cunha LimaDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda Araújo de MedeirosPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
David Bruno Melo AraújoPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Nicole BernardiDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Armando Augusto Noberto Galdino de AraújoDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Michelle Cristine Medeiros JacobPostgraduate Program in Social Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Adélia da Costa Pereira de Arruda NetaCenter for Studies and Research in Food, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dirce Maria Lobo MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clélia de Oliveira LyraDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli da Costa OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 431053/2016-2Coordenação de Aperfeição do Pessoal de Nível Superior,Brasil 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EAT-Lancet diet is a diet aimed at promoting population and planetary health from the perspective of sustainable diets in terms of environmental and health aspects. This study aimed to assess the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cardiometabolic risk factors among adults and elderly individuals in a capital city in the northeastern region of Brazil.

methodsThis is an analytical cross-sectional observational study from a population-based sample conducted between 2019 and 2020, involving 398 non-institutionalized adults and elderly people, of both sexes from "Brazilian Usual Consumption Assessment" study (Brazuca-Natal). There was a 38% response rate due to the suspension of data collection due to the covid-19 pandemic, but According to the comparative analysis of socioeconomic and demographic variables between the surveyed and non-surveyed sectors, losses were found to be random (p = 0.135, Little's MCAR test). Socioeconomic and lifestyle data, anthropometric measurements, and dietary consumption were collected. We used the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) and the Cardiovascular Health Diet Index (CHDI) for cardiovascular health to assess adherence to the diet's sustainability. The evaluated cardiometabolic parameters included fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. We also assessed the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia. For the data analyses, sample weights and the effect of the study design were taken into account. Pearson's chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of frequencies. Multiple linear regression models assessed the associations between PHDI and CHDI and its components and the cardiometabolic parameters.

resultsThe mean PHDI was 29.4 (95% CI 28.04:30.81), on a total score ranging from 0 to 150 points and the mean CHDI was 32.63 (95% CI 31.50:33.78), on a total score ranging from 0 to 110 points. PHDI showed a significant positive association with the final CHDI score and components of fruits, vegetables, and legumes, and a negative association with Ultra-processed Food (UPF) (p < 0.05). Notably, among the most consumed UPF, the following stand out: "packaged snacks, shoestring potatoes, and crackers" (16.94%), followed by margarine (14.14%). The PHDI exhibited a significant association with diabetes and dyslipidemia, as well as with systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and LDL-C.

conclusionsThe results suggest that adopting the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with the improvement of key cardiovascular health indicators.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAdultAgedBlood GlucoseBrazilCardiometabolic Risk FactorsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDietDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseCardiometabolic parametersCardiovascular diseasesEAT-Lancet dietSustainable dietsUltraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID39354466
PMCPMC11443638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.