ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Characterization of prognostic signature related with twelve types of programmed cell death in lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics profiling revealsTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- The role of immunogenic cell death in the prognosis and development of treatment strategies for non-small cell lung cancer: a multiomics and machine learning approach for predictive and personalized treatment.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Immunogenic cell death genes in single-cell and transcriptome analyses perspectives from a prognostic model of cervical cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a prognostic cell death index (CDI) based on the expression of genes related with various types of programmed cell death (PCD), and to assess its clinical relevance in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).
methodsPCD-related genes were gathered and analyzed in silico using the transcriptomic data from the LUSC cohorts of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). Differentially expressed PCD genes were analyzed, and a prognostic model was subsequently constructed. CDI scores were calculated for each patient, and their correlations with clinical features, survival outcomes, tumor mutation burden, gene clusters, and tumor microenvironment were investigated. Unsupervised consensus clustering was performed based on CDI model genes. Furthermore, the correlation of CDI for sensitivity of targeted drugs, chemotherapy efficacy, and immunotherapy responses was assessed.
resultsBased on 351 differentially expressed PCD genes in LUSC, a CDI signature comprising FGA, GAB2, JUN, and CDKN2A was identified. High CDI scores were significantly associated with poor survival outcomes (p < 0.05). Unsupervised clustering revealed three distinct patient subsets with varying survival rates. CDKN2A exhibited significantly different mutation patterns between patients with high and low CDI scores (p < 0.01). High CDI scores were also linked to increased immune cell infiltration of specific subsets and altered expression of immune-related genes. Patients with high-CDI showed reduced sensitivity to several chemotherapeutic drugs and a higher Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score, indicating potential resistance to immunotherapy.
conclusionThe CDI signature based on PCD genes offers valuable prognostic insights into LUSC, reflecting molecular heterogeneity, immune microenvironment associations, and potential therapeutic challenges. The CDI holds potential clinical utility in predicting treatment responses and guiding the selection of appropriate therapies for patients with LUSC. Future studies are warranted to further validate the prognostic value of CDI in combination with clinical factors and to explore its application across diverse patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.