Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355015›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2023

Automatic deep learning method for third lumbar selection and body composition evaluation on CT scans of cancer patients.

Lidia Delrieu, Damien Blanc, Amine Bouhamama, Fabien Reyal, Frank Pilleul, Victor Racine, Anne Sophie Hamy, Hugo Crochet, Timothée Marchal, Pierre Etienne Heudel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep-learning pipeline for automated skeletal muscle segmentation and sarcopenia detection.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lidia DelrieuResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris University, Paris, France.
Damien BlancQuantaCell, Pessac, France.
Amine BouhamamaDepartment of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Fabien ReyalResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris University, Paris, France.
Frank PilleulDepartment of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Victor RacineQuantaCell, Pessac, France.
Anne Sophie HamyResidual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris University, Paris, France.
Hugo CrochetData and Artificial Intelligence Team, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Timothée MarchalDepartment of Supportive Care, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Pierre Etienne HeudelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The importance of body composition and sarcopenia is well-recognized in cancer patient outcomes and treatment tolerance, yet routine evaluations are rare due to their time-intensive nature. While CT scans provide accurate measurements, they depend on manual processes. We developed and validated a deep learning algorithm to automatically select and segment abdominal muscles [SM], visceral fat [VAT], and subcutaneous fat [SAT] on CT scans. Materials and Methods: A total of 352 CT scans were collected from two cancer centers. The detection of the third lumbar vertebra and three different body tissues (SM, VAT, and SAT) were annotated manually. The 5-fold cross-validation method was used to develop the algorithm and validate its performance on the training cohort. The results were validated on an external, independent group of CT scans. Results: The algorithm for automatic L3 slice selection had a mean absolute error of 4 mm for the internal validation dataset and 5.5 mm for the external validation dataset. The median DICE similarity coefficient for body composition was 0.94 for SM, 0.93 for VAT, and 0.86 for SAT in the internal validation dataset, whereas it was 0.93 for SM, 0.93 for VAT, and 0.85 for SAT in the external validation dataset. There were high correlation scores with sarcopenia metrics in both internal and external validation datasets. Conclusions: Our deep learning algorithm facilitates routine research use and could be integrated into electronic patient records, enhancing care through better monitoring and the incorporation of targeted supportive measures like exercise and nutrition.

Indexed as

body compositioncancercomputed tomographydeep learningsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID39355015
PMCPMC11440831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.