Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355042›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nuclear medicine2023

Evaluation of deep space exploration risks and mitigations against radiation and microgravity.

William Dobney, Louise Mols, Dhruti Mistry, Kevin Tabury, Bjorn Baselet, Sarah Baatout

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Final Frontier: Toward Transformative Insights into the Pathophysiologic Adaptations to Microgravity with Molecular Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Can Humanity Thrive Beyond the Galaxy?The Journal of reproduction and development · 2025
    Review
  13. Space surgery: a SAGES' white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  14. Special Issue: 'Advances in Space Biology'.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William Dobney *Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Louise Mols *Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Dhruti MistryRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Kevin TaburyRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Bjorn BaseletRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Sarah BaatoutRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation and microgravity are two considerable health risks encountered during deep space exploration. Both have deleterious effects on the human body. On one hand, weightlessness is known to induce a weakening of the immune system, delayed wound healing and musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and sensorimotor deconditioning. On the other hand, radiation exposure can lead to long-term health effects such as cancer and cataracts as well as have an adverse effect on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems. Ionizing radiation originates from three main sources in space: galactic cosmic radiation, solar particle events and solar winds. Furthermore, inside the spacecraft and inside certain space habitats on Lunar and Martian surfaces, the crew is exposed to intravehicular radiation, which arises from nuclear reactions between space radiation and matter. Besides the approaches already in use, such as radiation shielding materials (such as aluminium, water or polyethylene), alternative shielding materials (including boron nanotubes, complex hybrids, composite hybrid materials, and regolith) and active shielding (using fields to deflect radiation particles) are being investigated for their abilities to mitigate the effects of ionizing radiation. From a biological point of view, it can be predicted that exposure to ionizing radiation during missions beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) will affect the human body in undesirable ways, e.g., increasing the risks of cataracts, cardiovascular and central nervous system diseases, carcinogenesis, as well as accelerated ageing. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the risks related to deep space exploration and to develop mitigation strategies to reduce these risks to a tolerable level. By using biomarkers for radiation sensitivity, space agencies are developing extensive personalised medical examination programmes to determine an astronaut's vulnerability to radiation. Moreover, researchers are developing pharmacological solutions (e.g., radioprotectors and radiomitigators) to proactively or reactively protect astronauts during deep space exploration. Finally, research is necessary to develop more effective countermeasures for use in future human space missions, which can also lead to improvements to medical care on Earth. This review will discuss the risks space travel beyond LEO poses to astronauts, methods to monitor astronauts' health, and possible approaches to mitigate these risks.

Indexed as

microgravitymitigationsradiation protectionrisk assessmentsspace radiation

Identifiers

PMID39355042
PMCPMC11440958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.