Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355056›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2023

Development and validation of radiomic signature for predicting overall survival in advanced-stage cervical cancer.

Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Umeshkumar B Sherkhane, Vinay Jaiswar, Sneha Shah, Nilendu Purandare, Kumar Prabhash, Amita Maheshwari, Sudeep Gupta, Leonard Wee and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashish Kumar JhaDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sneha MithunDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Umeshkumar B SherkhaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Vinay JaiswarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sneha ShahDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nilendu PurandareDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Amita MaheshwariDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sudeep GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Leonard WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
V RangarajanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of artificial intelligence and radiomics in prediction model development in cancer has been increasing every passing day. Cervical cancer is the 4th most common cancer in women worldwide, contributing to 6.5% of all cancer types. The treatment outcome of cervical cancer patients varies and individualized prediction of disease outcome is of paramount importance. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the digital signature for 5-year overall survival prediction in cervical cancer using robust CT radiomic and clinical features. Materials and Methods: Pretreatment clinical features and CT radiomic features of 68 patients, who were treated with chemoradiation therapy in our hospital, were used in this study. Radiomic features were extracted using an in-house developed python script and pyradiomic package. Clinical features were selected by the recursive feature elimination technique. Whereas radiomic feature selection was performed using a multi-step process i.e., step-1: only robust radiomic features were selected based on our previous study, step-2: a hierarchical clustering was performed to eliminate feature redundancy, and step-3: recursive feature elimination was performed to select the best features for prediction model development. Four machine algorithms i.e., Logistic regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support vector classifier (SVC), and Gradient boosting classifier (GBC), were used to develop 24 models (six models using each algorithm) using clinical, radiomic and combined features. Models were compared based on the prediction score in the internal validation. Results: The average prediction accuracy was found to be 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.81), and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82) for clinical, radiomic, and combined models developed using four prediction algorithms respectively. The average prediction accuracy was found to be 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.76), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.86), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62-0.80), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.78) for LR, RF, SVC and GBC models developed on three datasets respectively. Conclusion: Our study shows the promising predictive performance of a robust radiomic signature to predict 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients.

Indexed as

cervical cancerFIGOmachine learningprediction modelradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39355056
PMCPMC11440856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.