Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2024

Cardiovascular risk factors and development of nomograms in an Italian cohort of patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing SPECT or PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Rosario Megna, Mario Petretta, Carmela Nappi, Roberta Assante, Emilia Zampella, Valeria Gaudieri, Teresa Mannarino, Adriana D'Antonio, Roberta Green, Valeria Cantoni and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rosario MegnaInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.
Mario PetrettaIRCCS Synlab SDN, Naples, Italy.
Carmela NappiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Roberta AssanteDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Emilia ZampellaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Valeria GaudieriDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Teresa MannarinoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Adriana D'AntonioDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Roberta GreenDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Valeria CantoniDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Mariarosaria PanicoInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.
Wanda AcampaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Alberto CuocoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are non-invasive nuclear medicine techniques that can identify areas of abnormal myocardial perfusion. We assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing SPECT or PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Based on significant risk factors associated with an abnormal MPI, we developed a nomogram for each cohort as a pretest that would be helpful in decision-making for clinicians. Methods: A total of 6,854 patients with suspected CAD who underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging by SPECT or PET/CT was studied. As part of the baseline examination, clinical teams collected information on traditional cardiovascular risk factors: age, gender, body mass index, angina, dyspnea, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of CAD, and smoking. Results: The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was different in the two cohorts of patients undergoing SPECT ( Conclusions: Patients with suspected CAD belonging to two different cohorts undergoing SPECT or PET stress myocardial perfusion imaging can have different cardiovascular risk factors associated with a higher risk of an abnormal MPI study. As crude variables, age, gender, and diabetes were significant for both cohorts. Net of the effect of other covariates, age and gender were the only risk factors in common between the two cohorts. Furthermore, smoking and type of stress test were significant for the SPECT cohort, where as diabetes and hypertension were significant for the PET cohort. Nomograms obtained by significant risk factors for the two cohorts can be used by clinicians to evaluate the risk of an abnormal study.

Indexed as

cardiovascular risk factorscoronary artery diseasemyocardial perfusion imagingnomogramPETpretestreceiver operating characteristicSPECT

Identifiers

PMID39355219
PMCPMC11440955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.