Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355349›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Modulation of left ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats by acetylcholinesterase and ACE inhibitors: physiological, biochemical, and proteomic studies.

Lucie Hejnova, Zdenka Drastichova, Almos Boroš, Jaroslav Hrdlicka, Michal Behuliak, Jan Neckar, Josef Zicha, Jiri Novotny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucie Hejnova *Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Zdenka Drastichova *Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Almos Boroš *Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Jaroslav HrdlickaInstitute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Michal BehuliakInstitute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Jan NeckarInstitute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Josef ZichaInstitute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia.
Jiri NovotnyDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The consequences at the molecular level and the mechanisms involved in a possible cardioprotective effect of antihypertensive treatment are not yet fully understood. Here, the efficacy of pyridostigmine (PYR) and trandolapril (TRA) as antihypertensive and antihypertrophic agents was investigated and compared in hypertensive SHR and normotensive WKY rats. In parallel, we investigated the effects of these drugs on myocardial β-adrenergic and cholinergic signaling pathways and protein expression profiles. Methods: Age-matched male SHR and WKY rats were chronically (8 weeks) treated with PYR or TRA in drinking water. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored telemetrically prior to tissue sampling for biochemical analysis. Baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) and methylatropine HR response as a measure of vagal tone were evaluated in separate groups of animals. Results: PYR slightly lowered BP and HR in SHR rats during the dark phase of the day, while TRA effectively reduced BP during the light and dark phases without affecting HR. PYR enhanced BRS and improved vagal tone. There were no significant alterations in myocardial β-adrenergic and cholinergic signaling, with the exception of decreased forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity in SHR rats, which was restored by TRA. Proteomic analysis revealed numerous differences induced by both treatments. Notable were changes in TGFβ-related signaling pathways as well as proteins involved in modifying hemodynamic parameters and cardiac hypertrophy. Conclusions: PYR is able to slightly decrease BP and HR in SHR rats but effectively increase BRS through vagal potentiation. The specific differences in protein expression profiles in rat myocardium induced by treatment with PYR and TRA reflect different mechanisms of action of these two agents at the molecular level.

Indexed as

acetylcholinesterasecholinergic signalinghypertensionmyocardial proteomepyridostigmineSHR and WKY ratstrandolapril

Identifiers

PMID39355349
PMCPMC11443425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.