Trial reportInternational journal of women's health2024
Pilot Study of IL-1 Antagonist Anakinra for Treatment of Endometriosis.
Trial report in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Evidence and Emerging Directions in Endometriosis Pharmacotherapy: A Systematic Review of Recent Advances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting TLR4 Attenuates Endometriosis Progression by Suppressing NF-κB/NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Angiogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into inflammatory cytokines in adenomyosis‑induced infertility (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- From local lesion to multisystem disease: integrated crosstalk among the gut microbiota, immune system, and host metabolism in endometriosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Targeting innate immunity to modulate bone metabolism: a novel strategy for osteoporosis treatment.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Understanding Endometriosis: A Broad Review of Its Causes, Management, and Impact.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Endometriosis: An Immunologist's Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of an interleukin-1 (IL-1) antagonist anakinra (Kineret Methods: This was a single-site, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot clinical study of patients recruited at an academic specialty clinic. Eligible participants were females aged 18-45 years with menstrual cycles every 24-32 days. Subjects had moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and either a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis or an endometrioma on imaging. Subjects were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either the study drug or placebo administered as daily injections during the first 3 periods and then the alternate intervention for the next 3 periods. Results: Fifteen subjects completed the 6 menstrual cycle study. After each period, they completed the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) QoL questionnaire and an assessment of dysmenorrhea using a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). All domains of the EHP-30 showed a trend towards improvement, with significant improvements in powerlessness (54.5 vs 63.3, p = 0.04) and self-image (58.1 vs 66.7, p = 0.03) on the study drug compared to placebo. The mean dysmenorrhea VAS also trended toward improvement with a score of 37.5 during active treatment and 42.6 with placebo (p = 0.26). No difference in menstrual cycle length was detected (29.3 days vs 27.7 days, p = 0.56). There were significant differences in multiple inflammatory biomarkers between the study drug and placebo, including BDNF, IL-1, and IL-6 among certain groups. Conclusion: With all EHP-30 domains and the dysmenorrhea VAS showing either a statistical improvement or trend towards improvement, there is justification for a larger study. As no impact on menstrual cycles was detected, anakinra may be a particularly impactful option for women desiring fertility. Additional evaluation is needed on the role of anakinra on inflammatory markers given significant reductions were identified in multiple biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.