Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355499›Full record

ReviewCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2024

Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: Physiological determinants, clinical interventions and current randomised controlled trial evidence.

Toby Jeffcote, Kuan-Ying Lu, Philip Lewis, Dashiell Gantner, Camila R Battistuzzo, Andrew A Udy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Update on traumatic brain injury in the ICU.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Invasive and non-invasive monitoring in the ICU.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toby JeffcoteAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kuan-Ying LuAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Philip LewisOffice of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Enterprise and Engagement, Monash University, Australia.
Dashiell GantnerAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Camila R BattistuzzoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andrew A UdyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern intensive care for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) focuses on managing intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). This approach lacks robust clinical evidence and often overlooks the impact of hypoxic injuries. Emerging monitoring modalities, particularly those capable of measuring brain tissue oxygen, represent a promising avenue for advanced neuromonitoring. Among these, brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO

Indexed as

Intensive careSurgeryTrauma care deliveryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39355499
PMCPMC11440050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.