ArticleMidwifery2025
Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya.
Article in Midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing implementation of point-of-care tests for maternal and newborn screening and diagnosis in low-resource settings: a systematic review.BMC global and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of large-scale implementation of obstetric point of care ultrasound in eight counties in Kenya using RE-AIM framework.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The role of AI in reducing maternal mortality: Current impacts and future potentials: Protocol for an analytical cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Routine antenatal ultrasound by nurse-midwives in rural Kenya: a pragmatic trial assessing feasibility and effects of theFrontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound technology has become integral in antenatal care for its diagnostic effectiveness and potential to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite its proven benefits, challenges persist in its widespread adoption, particularly in low-resource settings like Kenya.
aimThe aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of healthcare providers regarding the integration of obstetric point-of-care ultrasound into routine maternal services in low-level facilities Kenya.
methodsUsing a descriptive qualitative study embedded in a large scale implementation study 76 healthcare providers who had undergone obstetric point-ofcare ultrasound training and were providing maternal services were purposively sampled from healthcare facilities across eight counties. Data was collected using structured audiotaped interviews, which were transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsFive main themes with several subthemes emerged from the analysis: (1) Clinical Decision-Making (2) Quality of Services, (3) Training, (4)Technology Issues, and (5) Sustainability. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study suggest that use of obstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound in resource-limited primary care settings, can enhance clinical decision making and influence patient management, ultimately resulting in significant health outcomes.
conclusionEquipping health care providers with skills to conduct obstetric point of care ultrasound can lead to better-informed clinical decisions and ultimately contribute to improved health outcomes in underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.