Evidence mapPaperPMID 39357877Full record

Trial reportApplied clinical informatics2024

Evaluation of a Primary Care-Integrated Mobile Health Intervention to Monitor between-Visit Asthma Symptoms.

Jorge A Sulca Flores, Anuj K Dalal, Jessica Sousa, Dinah Foer, Jorge A Rodriguez, Savanna Plombon, David W Bates, Adriana Arcia, Robert S Rudin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied clinical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04401332 (Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Routine Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04401332 nacompletednot on this map

Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Routine Primary Care: Monitoring Asthma Between Visits

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2020 to 2023Enrolled413ConditionsAsthmaArmsMobile health app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jorge A Sulca FloresDivision of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Anuj K DalalDivision of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jessica SousaHealth Care Division, RAND, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Dinah FoerHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jorge A RodriguezDivision of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Savanna PlombonDivision of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
David W BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Adriana ArciaHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.
Robert S RudinHealth Care Division, RAND, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS026432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate implementation of a digital remote symptom monitoring intervention that delivered weekly symptom questionnaires and included the option to receive nurse callbacks via a mobile app for asthma patients in primary care.

methodsResearch questions were structured by the NASSS (Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up Spread, and Sustainability) framework. Quantitative and qualitative methods assessed scalability of the electronic health record (EHR)-integrated app intervention implemented in a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Data sources included patient asthma control questionnaires; app usage logs; EHRs; and interviews and discussions with patients, primary care providers (PCPs), and nurses.

resultsWe included app usage data from 190 patients and interview data from 21 patients and several clinician participants. Among 190 patients, average questionnaire completion rate was 72.3% and retention was 78.9% (i.e., 150 patients continued to use the app at the end of the trial period). App use was lower among Hispanic and younger patients and those with fewer years of education. Of 1,185 nurse callback requests offered to patients. Thirty-three (2.8%) were requested. Of 84 PCP participants, 14 (16.7%) accessed the patient-reported data in the EHR. Analyses showed that the intervention was appropriate for all levels of asthma control; had no major technical barriers; was desirable and useful for patient treatment; involved achievable tasks for patients; required modest role changes for clinicians; and was a minimal burden on the organization.

conclusionA clinically integrated symptom monitoring intervention has strong potential for sustained adoption. Inequitable adoption remains a concern. PCP use of patient-reported data during visits could improve intervention adoption but may not be required for patient benefits.

Indexed as

AsthmaMobile ApplicationsPrimary Health CareTelemedicineAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39357877
PMCPMC11446627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.