ArticleScientific reports2024
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and RGB-imaging: a comparative study of non-invasive haemoglobin assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive assessment of haemoglobin (Hb) level in blood is a hot spot in the point-of-care biomedical diagnostics. Several optical methods are suggested as a solution, some of them being approved for clinical use. Still, there is no consensus on the accuracy of optical techniques, the quality of Hb assessment on different tissue sites, and on the ability of combined use of several optical techniques to improve the quality of Hb level prediction. In this work we examined the capabilities of two optical techniques-diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and RGB-imaging of the skin and fingernails areas-in detecting low blood Hb level. The test sample consisted of 240 adult volunteers with 70 volunteers exhibiting Hb level lower than 120 g/L. We show that using simple descriptors of the diffuse reflectance spectrum of the forearm skin and fingernails is applicable for predicting low blood Hb concentration (ROC-AUC = 0.84 ± 0.08), while RGB-imaging shows similar performance when applied to the fingernail areas (ROC-AUC = 0.83 ± 0.07), which can be considered perspective for clinical use and screening properties. We also report that while the joint use of predictions from two optical methods slightly improves the accuracy of non-invasive Hb level assessment (ROC-AUC = 0.86 ± 0.07), the effect is not as high as one might expect from combining predictions of truly independent modalities, indicating the limit of the accuracy one can expect with multimodal optical approach. We review this case and propose possible solutions towards more sensitive non-invasive optical determination of hemoglobin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.