Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358547›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2025

From computational models of the splicing code to regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic implications.

Charlotte Capitanchik, Oscar G Wilkins, Nils Wagner, Julien Gagneur, Jernej Ule

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RNA splicing in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. RNA Sequencing Resolves Cryptic Pathogenic Variants in Mitochondrial Disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte Capitanchik *The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-2792
Oscar G Wilkins *The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Nils Wagner *School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Julien GagneurSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. gagneur@in.tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-8365
Jernej UleThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. jernej.ule@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-4277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of RNA splicing and its role in gene expression, researchers have sought a set of rules, an algorithm or a computational model that could predict the splice isoforms, and their frequencies, produced from any transcribed gene in a specific cellular context. Over the past 30 years, these models have evolved from simple position weight matrices to deep-learning models capable of integrating sequence data across vast genomic distances. Most recently, new model architectures are moving the field closer to context-specific alternative splicing predictions, and advances in sequencing technologies are expanding the type of data that can be used to inform and interpret such models. Together, these developments are driving improved understanding of splicing regulatory mechanisms and emerging applications of the splicing code to the rational design of RNA- and splicing-based therapeutics.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingComputational BiologyModels, GeneticRNA SplicingAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.