Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358594›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Impact of first-line antihypertensive drug class and intensity on NT-proBNP improvement and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with pre-heart failure: findings from SPRINT trial.

Lili Wang, Jiayi Yi, Wei Wang, Zeming Zhou, Jiamin Liu, Haibo Zhang, Yan Li, Xiangpeng Ren, Jiapeng Lu, Xin Zheng

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lili Wang *National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jiayi Yi *Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei WangNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Zeming ZhouNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jiamin LiuNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Haibo ZhangNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yan LiNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xiangpeng RenDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Jiapeng LuNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xin ZhengNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China. zhengxin@fuwai.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five first-line classes of antihypertensive drugs are recommended for hypertension treatment. However, it is unclear which class should be chosen for hypertensive patients with pre-heart failure (pre-HF). The study aimed to investigate the association between antihypertensive drug classes and intensity with probability of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) improvement and risk of cardiovascular events among pre-HF hypertensive patients. Utilizing the data from SPRINT, we included pre-HF hypertensive patients, identified by NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL at baseline. NT-proBNP improvement is defined as a reduction of ≥50% to a level below 125 pg/mL. A total of 3293 patients (mean age: 71.9 years; female: 43.8%) were included. NT-proBNP improvement was observed in 415 patients (12.6%) over 1-year follow up. Thiazide-type diuretics users were associated with a higher likelihood of NT-proBNP improvement (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.70), a lower risk of HF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78) and primary composite outcome (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.89). ACEI/ARB users were only associated with a lower risk of primary composite outcome (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99). In contrast, beta-blockers users were associated with a lower likelihood of NT-proBNP improvement (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.55), while a higher risk of HF (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.21-2.64) and primary composite outcome (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). These associations varied across subgroups of different drug intensities. This post hoc analysis supports the use of thiazide-type diuretics and ACEI/ARB for prevention of cardiovascular events. The use of beta-blockers is associated with an increased risk of HF and primary outcomes, which requires further validation. Association between antihypertensive drug classes and intensity with NT-proBNP improvement and long-term clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHeart FailureHypertensionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overDiureticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsDiureticsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Antihypertensive drug classesHypertensionN-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptidepre-Heart FailureTherapeutic Intensity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.