Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39358792›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2024

Enzymatic TET-1 inhibition highlights different epigenetic behaviours of IL-1β and TNFα in tumour progression of OS cell lines.

Daniele Bellavia, Salvatore Caruccio, Fabio Caradonna, Viviana Costa, Ornella Urzì, Lavinia Raimondi, Angela De Luca, Stefania Pagani, Flores Naselli, Gianluca Giavaresi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimetastatic Effects of aAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Integrative cancer therapies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniele BellaviaSC Scienze E Tecnologie Chirurgiche - SS Piattaforma Scienze Omiche Per Ortopedia Personalizzata, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Salvatore CaruccioDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), Section of Cellular Biology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Fabio CaradonnaDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), Section of Cellular Biology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Viviana CostaSC Scienze E Tecnologie Chirurgiche - SS Piattaforma Scienze Omiche Per Ortopedia Personalizzata, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. Viviana.costa@ior.it.
Ornella Urzì. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), Vienna, Austria.
Lavinia RaimondiSC Scienze E Tecnologie Chirurgiche - SS Piattaforma Scienze Omiche Per Ortopedia Personalizzata, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Angela De LucaSC Scienze E Tecnologie Chirurgiche - SS Piattaforma Scienze Omiche Per Ortopedia Personalizzata, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania PaganiSC Scienze E Tecnologie Chirurgiche - SS Piattaforma Scienze Omiche Per Ortopedia Personalizzata, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Flores Naselli *Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), Section of Cellular Biology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Gianluca Giavaresi *SC Scienze E Tecnologie Chirurgiche - SS Piattaforma Scienze Omiche Per Ortopedia Personalizzata, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most frequent primary malignant bone tumour, whose heterogeneity represents a major challenge for common antitumour therapies. Inflammatory cytokines are known to be necessary for OS progression. Therefore, to optimise therapy, it is important to discover reliable biomarkers by identifying the mechanism generating OS and investigating the inflammatory pathways that support the undifferentiated state. In this work, we highlight the differences of epigenetic activities of IL-1β and TNFα, and the susceptibility of TET-1 enzymatic inhibition, in tumour progression of three different OS cell lines. Investigating DNA methylation of IL-6 promoter and determining its expression, we found that TET enzymatic inhibition influences proliferation induced by inflammatory cytokines in OS cell lines. Moreover, Bobcat 339 treatment blocks IL-1β epigenetic action on IL-6 promoter, while only partially those of TNFα as well as inhibits IL-1β-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, but only partially those of TNFα. In conclusion, this work highlights that IL-1β and TNFα have different effects on DNA demethylation in OS cell lines, making DNA methylation a potential biomarker of disease. Specifically, in IL-1β treatment, TET-1 inhibition completely blocks tumour progression, while in TNFα actions, it is only partially effective. Given that these two inflammatory pathways can be therapeutic targets for treating these tumours, knowledge of their distinct epigenetic behaviours can be useful for developing precise and specific therapeutic strategies for this disease.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticInterleukin-1betaOsteosarcomaProto-Oncogene ProteinsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaBone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInterleukin-6Mixed Function OxygenasesPromoter Regions, GeneticIL1B protein, humanInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6Mixed Function OxygenasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTET1 protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaEpigeneticsInflammationMetastasisOsteosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID39358792
PMCPMC11448002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.