ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Mastering meta-analysis in Microsoft Excel with MetaXL add-in: A comprehensive tutorial and guide to meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence of sight-threatening ocular abnormalities identified by retinal examination in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Association Between Mesh Placement and Recurrence and Chronic Pain After Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Automated seizure detection using wearable devices: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of tonic-clonic and focal seizure detection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Heart Failure in Patients with Sarcopenia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2025Pooled it
- Prioritizing circulation over airway to improve survival in trauma patients with exsanguinating injuries: a world society of emergency surgery-panamerican trauma consensus statement.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of magnesium levels in pregnancy on adverse birth outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- HIV-1 Prevalence and Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Effectiveness and Prevalence of Use Among Key Populations in High-Income Economies (2017-2023): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Review
- A scoping review comparing individual and multi-level physical activity interventions in rural women in the United States.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Mastering meta-analysis in Microsoft Excel with MetaXL add-in: A comprehensive tutorial and guide to meta-analysis.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of ab-interno XEN 45 gel implantation versus trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleMeta-analysis, a powerful technique for combining effect estimates from multiple studies, enhances statistical power and precision. However, its adoption can be hindered by challenges in statistical interpretation and the complexity of specialized software. MetaXL, a freely available Microsoft Excel add-in, aims to mitigate these barriers by providing comprehensive support and facilitating seamless integration of meta-analytical results into research publications. AIMS AND
objectivesThis tutorial illustrates the practical application of MetaXL for synthesizing meta-analytical evidence, with a focus on common effect sizes and their presentation.
methodThis paper reintroduce MetaXL's functions and provide concise explanations of common effect sizes employed in meta-analysis. The tutorial delves into fundamental concepts such as the selection of appropriate effect sizes for pooling and the choice of meta-analytical models. Eight illustrative examples are presented, incorporating diverse effect sizes and data formats, including scenarios involving incidence rate ratios, weighted and standardized mean differences, hazard ratios, and prevalence. Additionally, key concepts in network meta-analysis are discussed, along with their implementation in MetaXL. MetaXL provides convenient access to data formatting templates tailored to various data types and effect sizes encountered in included studies. RESULTS AND
conclusionThis tutorial offers researchers, particularly those with limited resources, detailed explanations and insights into commonly used methodologies for pooling effect sizes. Furthermore, it introduces the new Excel functions that comes with the MetaXL add-in. Accurate population of this function and adherence to the correct format are essential to ensure error-free analyzes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.