ArticleCureus2024
Analyzing the Bioactivity of a Novel Bone Cement: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Color Change in Commercial Resin Composites with Different Photoinitiators.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo analyze the effect of bioactive bone cement (BBC) placed in a phosphate buffer saline solution in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). METHODOLOGY: Ten samples each of BBC (group 1) and MTA (group 2) were prepared and stored in a phosphate buffer saline solution. After three days of storage, white precipitates were formed on the surface of the samples. The solution with precipitates from each sample was analyzed for the presence of calcium and phosphate ions with coupled plasma atomic spectroscopy.
resultsBBC showed a significant amount of calcium and phosphate release after a seven-day storage period in phosphate buffer saline solution. Calcium release was significantly higher in group 1 (MTA) (p < 0.001) compared to that in group 2 (BBC), while group 2 (BBC) (p < 0.001) exhibited greater phosphate release compared to group 1 (MTA).
conclusionBBC (group 2) retains its bioactivity when it comes into contact with a stimulated oral environment (STF). This demonstrates that BBC is bioactive in a simulated oral environment. Moreover, it retained good handling properties and could be easily manipulated into a dough form. Clinically, in cases of apical surgery, internal resorption or perforation repair where material placement poses difficulty, BBC will prove to be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.