ArticleHaematologica2025
Clinical outcomes of three haploidentical transplantation protocols for hematologic malignancies based on data from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry Group.
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Randomized trial of anti-thymocyte globulin plus lowdose post-transplant cyclophosphamide to prevent graft-Haematologica · 2025Trial
- Article
- Development and Validation of a Cytokine-Based Predictive Model for Acute GvHD and Composite Outcomes in ATG-Based Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Leukemia epidemiology in China: Burden, trends, and determinants in the 21st century.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of C-reactive protein/platelet ratio from diagnosis to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG), posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and PTCy combined with low-dose ATG (PTCy with ATGlow)-based haploidentical transplantation protocols in patients with hematologic malignancies. The comparisons were conducted via propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to balance the basic characteristics among different groups and were based on the transplantation data reported to the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry Group (CBMTRG) from January 2020 to December 2022. For each patient in the PTCy or PTCy with ATGlow group, patients (at a 1:2 ratio) from the G-CSF/ATG group were selected. In total, the PTCy group (N=122) was matched with the G-CSF/ATG group 1 (N=230), and the PTCy+ATGlow group (N=123) was matched with the G-CSF/ATG group 2 (N=226). Compared with those in the PTCy group, the incidences of 28- day neutrophil engraftment (P=0.005), 100-day platelet engraftment (P=0.002), median time to neutrophil engraftment (P<0.001) and platelet engraftment (P=0.011) were significantly greater in the G-CSF/ATG group. No significant differences were observed in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) incidence or relapse incidence. In addition, patients in the G-CSF/ ATG group had lower non-relapse mortality (NRM; P<0.001), better 3-year overall survival (OS; P<0.001) and leukemia-free survival (P<0.001) rates than those in the PTCy group. Similarly, the G-CSF/ATG group achieved lower NRM (P<0.001) and better 3-year leukemia-free survival (P=0.002) than the PTCy+ATGlow group. In conclusion, G-CSF/ATG-based haplo-HSCT may be a preferential choice for the Chinese population with hematologic malignancies. In the future, a randomized controlled study is needed for further confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.