Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363872›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2025

Clinical outcomes of three haploidentical transplantation protocols for hematologic malignancies based on data from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry Group.

Zheng-Li Xu, Jie Ji, San-Bin Wang, Nai-Nong Li, Jian Zhou, Ming-Hao Lin, Lan-Ping Xu, Yu Wang, Xiao-Hui Zhang, Xiao-Jun Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Leukemia epidemiology in China: Burden, trends, and determinants in the 21st century.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zheng-Li XuPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing.
Jie JiDepartment of Hematology and Institute of Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Celluar Therapy Division, Clinic Trial Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu.
San-Bin WangDepartment of Hematology, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming, P.R. China.
Nai-Nong LiFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. Translational Medicine Center on Hematology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou.
Jian ZhouAffiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou.
Ming-Hao LinPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing.
Lan-Ping XuPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing.
Yu WangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing.
Xiao-Hui ZhangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing.
Xiao-Jun HuangPeking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China; State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University, Beijing. xjhrm@medmail.com.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG), posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and PTCy combined with low-dose ATG (PTCy with ATGlow)-based haploidentical transplantation protocols in patients with hematologic malignancies. The comparisons were conducted via propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to balance the basic characteristics among different groups and were based on the transplantation data reported to the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry Group (CBMTRG) from January 2020 to December 2022. For each patient in the PTCy or PTCy with ATGlow group, patients (at a 1:2 ratio) from the G-CSF/ATG group were selected. In total, the PTCy group (N=122) was matched with the G-CSF/ATG group 1 (N=230), and the PTCy+ATGlow group (N=123) was matched with the G-CSF/ATG group 2 (N=226). Compared with those in the PTCy group, the incidences of 28- day neutrophil engraftment (P=0.005), 100-day platelet engraftment (P=0.002), median time to neutrophil engraftment (P<0.001) and platelet engraftment (P=0.011) were significantly greater in the G-CSF/ATG group. No significant differences were observed in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) incidence or relapse incidence. In addition, patients in the G-CSF/ ATG group had lower non-relapse mortality (NRM; P<0.001), better 3-year overall survival (OS; P<0.001) and leukemia-free survival (P<0.001) rates than those in the PTCy group. Similarly, the G-CSF/ATG group achieved lower NRM (P<0.001) and better 3-year leukemia-free survival (P=0.002) than the PTCy+ATGlow group. In conclusion, G-CSF/ATG-based haplo-HSCT may be a preferential choice for the Chinese population with hematologic malignancies. In the future, a randomized controlled study is needed for further confirmation.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, HaploidenticalAdolescentAdultAgedAntilymphocyte SerumChildChinaCyclophosphamideEast Asian PeopleFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansAntilymphocyte SerumCyclophosphamideGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID39363872
PMCPMC11873695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.