ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Exploring bleeding in oral anticoagulant users: assessing incidence by indications and risk factors in the entire nationwide cohort.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective Thrombin Modulation by AYA1809002: Stability and On-Demand Reversal of an Exosite I-Targeting Aptamer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reassessing the need for long-term oral anticoagulation following successful atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Review
- Vonoprazan vs Proton Pump Inhibitors for Gastroprotection in Anticoagulated Patients: A Real-World Cohort Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Characterization of anticoagulated patients in a Latin American country: indications, treatment patterns, and complications.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Real-world bleeding risk and molecular interaction profiles of direct oral anticoagulants: a comparative study integrating clinical outcomes andFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Major Bleeding in Elderly Patients on Oral Anticoagulants for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Single-Center 12-Year Retrospective Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Epigenetic metabolite lipid nanoparticles alleviate venous thrombosis via bone marrow reprogramming.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are essential for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, but bleeding, a major complication, can have a fatal impact on the patient's treatment. Objectives: We aimed to estimate the nationwide, real-world incidence rate of bleeding in patients taking OACs and confirm the incidence by indications and risk factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study identified OAC users from April 1 to December 31, in both 2019 and 2020, using the HIRA-NPS database. The primary outcome variables were the incidence rate of major bleeding events during OAC treatment and within 30 days of treatment discontinuation. We estimated the adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) in subpopulations. Results: Among 18,822 OAC users, the incidence rate of major bleeding was 27.9 (95% CI: 24.6-31.5) per 1,000 person-years. The incidence rate of major bleeding was higher in patients with a bleeding history, with an aIRR of 11.51; those at high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score ≥3), with an aIRR of 1.51; those with high CCI scores ≥3, with an aIRR of 1.88; and those with liver disease, with an aIRR of 1.41. For indications, compared to patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), the aIRR of major bleeding was significantly higher at an aIRR of 2.35 in patients undergoing VTE treatment. Patients with ischemic stroke showed a higher incidence of major bleeding with an aIRR of 2.13 than NVAF patients. The aIRR of major bleeding in the oral anticoagulant group, compared to the matched control group, was 2.25 (95% CI: 1.93-2.63). Conclusion: These findings may be useful for implementing strategies to improve the evaluation and management of anticoagulation-related bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.