ArticleHeliyon2024
Towards a modelling, optimization and predictive control framework for smart irrigation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and evaluation of a solar powered smart irrigation system for sustainable urban agriculture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of ground based spectral imaging for real time maize biomass monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart irrigation scheduling is a promising approach for improving the efficiency and sustainability of agricultural water use, especially in arid and semi-arid lands. In this paper, we present a design and simulation of a model predictive controller for smart irrigation scheduling. The proposed controller is based on a mathematical model of the irrigation system, which is used to predict the future states of the system and determine the optimal irrigation schedule for a given crop and field. This study further evaluates the impact of the predictive control framework on crop yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and water savings in tomato production. Three control strategies, including manual control, open-loop control, and model predictive control (MPC), were compared using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) methodology. Results indicate that MPC outperforms the other strategies, yielding the highest average crop yield of 20 t/ha and demonstrating superior WUE at 10.4 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.