ReviewJournal of comparative effectiveness research2024
Use of transportability methods for real-world evidence generation: a review of current applications.
Review in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demonstrating transportability of real-world evidence: what do HTA bodies and health technology developers need?International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Review
- Transportability Analyses in Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Conceptual Framework and Methodological Principles Endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Transportability of the comparative effect of finerenone for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥40%: insights from the FINEARTS-HF trial.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Moving From Representativeness Toward Transportability in an Era of Digital and Big Data.International journal of public health · 2026Review
- Transportability of nonlocal real-world evidence and its relevance to health technology assessment: a primer.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Review
- Actions for stakeholders to develop better real-world evidence for HTA bodies/payers decision making.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Real-world evidence: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Review
- A Multi-Country Study of the Clinical Course of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Six-Study Analysis of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- How life-cycle real-world evidence can bridge evidentiary gaps in precision oncology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.