ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2025
Non-rodent Models of Atherosclerosis: Repurposing of Existing Drugs and Search for Novel Treatment Strategies.
Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Current status and challenges of multi-omics research using animal models of atherosclerosis.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atherosclerosis and associated cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of illness and mortality worldwide. The development of atherosclerosis is a complex process involving oxidative stress, surplus lipid deposition and retention, endothelial dysfunction, and chronic inflammation. Developing novel anti-atherogenic and repurposing existing drugs requires the use of suitable animal models to characterise the fundamental mechanisms underlying atherosclerosis initiation and progression and to evaluate potential therapeutic effects. Commonly used rodent models, however, are not always appropriate, and other models may be required to translate these discoveries into valuable preventive and treatment agents for human applications. Recent advances in gene-editing tools for large animals have allowed the creation of animals that develop atherosclerosis faster and more similarly to humans in terms of lesion localisation and histopathology. In this review, we discuss the major advantages and drawbacks of the main non-rodent animal models of atherosclerosis, particularly rabbits, pigs, zebrafish, and non-human primates. Moreover, we review the application of recently invented novel therapeutic methods and agents, and repurposed existing drugs (such as antidiabetic and anticancer) for atherosclerosis treatment, the efficacy of which is verified on non-rodent animal models of atherosclerosis. In total, the proper selection of a suitable animal model of atherosclerosis facilitates reproducible and rigorous translational research in repurposing of existing drugs, discovering new therapeutic strategies, and validating novel anti-atherosclerotic drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.