Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365256›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

'Whatever the GP says, is what I'll do'-A qualitative study of patient perspectives in accessing primary eye care for type 2 diabetes.

Jessie Huang-Lung, Akshay Rai, Annita Duong, Apirami Balakrishnan, Abdullah Khan, Jeremy Husudo, Rajendra Gyawali, Joseph Nazarian, Belinda Ford, Joel Rhee and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 'Whatever the GP says, is what I'll do'-A qualitative study of patient perspectives in accessing primary eye care for type 2 diabetes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jessie Huang-LungSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5647-6046
Akshay RaiSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Annita DuongSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Apirami BalakrishnanSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abdullah KhanSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jeremy HusudoSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rajendra GyawaliSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-8022
Joseph NazarianNazarian Optometrists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Belinda FordThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joel RheeDiscipline of General Practice, School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Isabelle JalbertSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1351-0072
Lisa KeaySchool of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Elizabeth O'Beirne and Robert and Emmy Mather Trust Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo investigate the perspectives of people accessing a general medical practitioner (GP)-optometry model of collaborative care that was established to increase access to diabetes eye care.

methodsQualitative study of patient barriers and facilitators to accessing primary diabetes eye care located in a metropolitan area in Australia. One-on-one interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a determinant framework on patient-centred access to health care.

resultsTwenty-four people with type 2 diabetes, including 15 males and 9 females, who accessed the service between September 2021 and June 2022 agreed to participate. Mean (SD) age of the participants was 52 (12) years and 50% had been diagnosed with diabetes for <2 years. Facilitators to accessing diabetes eye care included a referral from a GP or GP nurse, fee-free consultations, availability of after-hours appointments and short waiting times. Barriers to access included perceived out-of-pocket costs, competing responsibilities and lack of awareness of diabetic retinopathy screening recommendations.

conclusionConsidering diabetic retinopathy may present asymptomatically, primary health practitioners (optometrists and GPs) are well positioned to raise patient awareness of the importance of routine eye examinations. In Australia, access to routine screening could be facilitated by fee-free eye checks and personalised text message reminders implemented at a health system level.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and Consultationcollaborative carediabetic retinopathyhealthcare accessprimary carequalitative study

Identifiers

PMID39365256
PMCPMC11629847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.