Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39365294›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2024

Persistent Patient-Level Effect of Guselkumab at Consecutive 8-Week Dosing Visits and Over Time in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of a 2-Year, Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Philip J Mease, Xenofon Baraliakos, Vinod Chandran, Enrique R Soriano, Peter Nash, Atul Deodhar, Emmanouil Rampakakis, Natalie J Shiff, Soumya D Chakravarty, May Shawi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Philip J MeaseProvidence Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-0457
Xenofon BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9475-9362
Vinod ChandranUniversity of Toronto and Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-0275
Enrique R SorianoHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires and University Institute Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-1084
Peter NashGriffith University and University of Queensland, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2571-788X
Atul DeodharOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-1246
Emmanouil RampakakisMcGill University and JSS Medical Research, Inc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Natalie J ShiffJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, A Johnson & Johnson Company, Horsham, Pennsylvania, and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Soumya D ChakravartyJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, A Johnson & Johnson Company, Horsham, Pennsylvania, and Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7957-838X
May ShawiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey.
Joseph F MerolaUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Iain B McInnesCollege of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4449-8501

Funding

Janssen Research and Development, LLC.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGroup-level analyses from the phase 3 DISCOVER-2 trial of guselkumab demonstrated robust and durable improvements across psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. To specifically evaluate continuous disease control in individual patients, persistence of clinically relevant improvements was assessed, both at consecutive guselkumab dosing visits and over time.

methodsPost hoc analyses included biologic-naïve patients randomized to 100 mg of guselkumab at week 0, week 4, and then every 8 weeks (Q8W). Improvements in joint (minimal clinically important improvement [MCII] in Disease Activity Index for PsA [DAPSA; ≥7.25], clinical DAPSA [cDAPSA; ≥5.7]), skin (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1), and overall disease activity (patient global assessment of arthritis and psoriasis [PtGA Arthritis+Psoriasis; MCII ≥ 15 mm], PsA Disease Activity Score [PASDAS; MCII ≥ 0.8]) were assessed. Proportions of patients with maintenance of DAPSA and cDAPSA MCII at consecutive Q8W guselkumab dosing visits (ie, at weeks 4 and 12, weeks 12 and 20, etc through week 52) and patient-level durability of response through week 100 (Kaplan-Meier) were determined.

resultsAmong 248 patients randomized to guselkumab Q8W, 93% to 99% maintained clinical improvement in joint disease at consecutive Q8W dosing visits through week 52 across time periods. Among guselkumab patients achieving MCII by week 24, estimated probabilities of maintenance of clinical improvement 100 weeks post achievement ranged from 68% (IGA 0/1) to 89% (PASDAS MCII). Median times to loss of improvement were not reached; estimated mean weeks of maintenance of improvement were 58.6, 52.4, 75.7, 83.6, and 76.7, respectively, for DAPSA, cDAPSA, IGA, PtGA Arthritis+Psoriasis, and PASDAS.

conclusionGuselkumab provided highly durable patient-level improvements, both at consecutive Q8W dosing visits for joint disease activity and over time across PsA domains according to physician- and patient-driven assessments.

Identifiers

PMID39365294
PMCPMC11638138

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.