SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
Delayed primary skin closure reduce surgical site infection following surgery for gastrointestinal perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing surgery for Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, there is an increased occurrence of Surgical Site Infections (SSI). The beneficial effect of employing delayed primary skin closure (DPC) on severely contaminated incisions subsequent to surgery for GI perforation remains unverified.
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the advantages of the DPC management in surgery for GI perforation.
methodsA literature search was performed using ClinicalTrials.gov, Pubmed, Embase, Cocharane, and Web of Science identified all eligible English-language studies related to surgery for GI perforation through October 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DPC with primary skin closure (PC) in surgery for GI perforation were included. Two investigators independently performed the inclusion work, and a third investigator was consulted for resolving conflicts. Data were extracted by multiple independent investigators and pooled in a random-effects model. The primary outcome was SSI, defined in accordance with the original studies. The secondary outcome was the length of stay (LOS).
resultsFinal analysis included 12 RCTs which included a total of 903 patients were randomizing divided into either DPC or PC, including 289 patients with gastroduodenal perforation (32%), 144 patients with small intestine perforation (15.96%), 60 patients with colon perforation (6.64%), and 410 patients with appendix perforation (45.4%). The rates of SSI was significantly decreased after DPC management (OR:0.31, 95%CI:0.15-0.63, p < 0.01), no significant differences were observed between the DPC group and PC group in terms of LOS (MD: - 0.37, 95% CI: - 1.91-1.16, p = 0.63).
conclusionThese results point to the efficacy of DPC management in reducing SSI in patients under surgery for GI perforation, and this strategy did not increase the LOS. This systematic review and meta-analysis may contribute to informed decision-making in the management of severely contaminated wounds associated with GI perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39365297What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.