ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2024
Recent advances in the expanding genetic code.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescent non-canonical amino acid as a site-specific conformational probe of prion formation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A photo-enhanced oxidative coupling for site-specific protein Labeling via noncanonical amino acid incorporation.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026Article
- Biocatalytic Synthesis of N-Protected α-Amino Acids through 1,3-Nitrogen Migration by Nonheme Iron Enzymes.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates with dual payloads: potential, methods and considerations.mAbs · 2025Review
- A chemical epigenetic tool to probe site-specific DNA-binding protein complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Backbone extension acyl rearrangements edit cellular proteins to install β-, γ- and δ-backbones.Nature chemical biology · 2025Article
- Identification of Actionable Targeted Protein Degradation Effector Sites through Site-Specific Ligand Incorporation-Induced Proximity (SLIP).Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For over a billion years, the central dogma of biology has been limited largely to 20 canonical amino acids with relatively simple functionalities. The ability to rationally add new building blocks to the genetic code has enabled the site-specific incorporation of hundreds of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) with novel properties into proteins in living organisms. Recent technological advances have enabled high level mammalian expression of proteins containing ncAAs, the use of unique codons to direct ncAA incorporation, extension of this methodology to a range of eukaryotic organisms, and the ability to encode building blocks beyond α-amino acids. These ncAAs have been used to study and control proteins in their native cellular context and to engineer enzymes and biotherapeutics with improved or novel properties. Herein we discuss recent developments in the field and potential future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.