Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367464›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

The application effect of the segmented teaching method in training medical students on clinical practice skills.

Chao Liu, Mei Ren, Chaoen Luo, Khan Asfandyar, Huijie Dai, Jinxin Yang, Zhengwen Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chao LiuDepartment of Sports Medicine, Orthopaedic Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Mei RenClinical Practice Skills Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Chaoen LuoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Khan AsfandyarDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Huijie DaiClinical Practice Skills Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Jinxin YangClinical Practice Skills Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Zhengwen LeiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China. leizhengwen0803@163.com.

Funding

Hunan Province General Higher Education Teaching Reform Research Project HNJG-20230600Ministry of Education's Industry University Cooperation Education Project 230800179250940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical clinical practice skill training is an important part of medical undergraduate education. Surgical skills are complex and difficult to master. However, the traditional teaching method has some disadvantages, for example, low student participation, weak learning atmosphere, inadequate mastery of the subject matter. We innovatively put forward the segmented teaching method in the field of clinical practice skills training. The segmented teaching method refers to dividing a specific teaching content into several relatively independent parts and providing segmented practice for each part. This approach enhances students' learning outcomes.The aim of this controlled study is to investigate the effects of the segmented teaching methods on clinical practice skills training in medical students.

methods31 medical students participating in clinical practice skill training at The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China from March to April 2024 were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 16) receiving segmented teaching method or the control group (n = 15) receiving traditional teaching method. After completion of practical exercises, both groups underwent operational assessments, theoretical assessments, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX), and Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) for teaching quality evaluation. A comparative analysis of the results between the two groups was conducted.

resultsAfter implementing the program, there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the experimental and control groups in theoretical assessment scores, Mini-CEX clinical judgment scores, and SEEQ teaching quality evaluation scores. However, compared to the control group, the experimental group demonstrated better operational assessment scores, higher Mini-CEX scores in history taking, physical examination, professionalism, doctor-patient communication, organizational efficiency, and comprehensive abilities, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe application of segmented teaching method in clinical practice skill training for medical students yields favorable training outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalTeachingChinaEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleRandom AllocationApplication effectMedical studentsSegmented teaching methodSurgical clinical practice skill trainingTeaching approach

Identifiers

PMID39367464
PMCPMC11451101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.