Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367485›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024

Does early combination vs. Monotherapy improve clinical outcomes of clinically extremely vulnerable patients with COVID-19? Results from a retrospective propensity-weighted analysis.

Mazzitelli Maria, Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Claudia Cozzolino, Lolita Sasset, Anna Ferrari, Monica Basso, Eleonora Vania, Nicola Bonadiman, Vincenzo Scaglione, Anna Maria Cattelan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mazzitelli Maria *Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy. m.mazzitelli88@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0263-0703
Alberto Enrico Maraolo *Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Claudia CozzolinoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Lolita SassetInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Anna FerrariInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Monica BassoInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Eleonora VaniaInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Nicola BonadimanInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Vincenzo ScaglioneInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Anna Maria CattelanInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, 35128, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential efficacy of early combination therapy, based on an antiviral plus a monoclonal antibody, for COVID-19 in severely immunocompromised patients is matter of debate.

objectivesOur aim was to describe the impact on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 treatments in severely immunocompromised individuals, evaluating differences between a combination and a monotherapy.

methodsWe included severely immunocompromised outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received an early treatment (either monotherapy with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir or the combination of an antiviral plus sotrovimab). We then assessed differences between the two treatment strategies on three main outcomes (30-day mortality, access to emergency department, hospitalization), separately and as a composite by using a propensity score weighted (PSW) approach.

resultsEighty one severely immunocompromised patients were included, 39 receiving early combination therapy and 42 receiving monotherapy. No significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality rate and hospitalization rate between subjects in the two groups, while access to the emergency department following treatment administration was significantly higher in people who received a combination therapy. After applying the PSW, it was observed that combination therapy impacted favourably on the composite outcome, in a statistically significant fashion. In addition, PSW approach for mortality showed that age was the only significant factor influencing the death as stand-alone outcome.

conclusionsEarly combination therapy showed a favourable impact on a composite outcome (including mortality, hospitalizations and access to emergency department) in severely immunocompromised hosts who were all vaccinated. However, further studies are needed to support our results.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug Therapy, CombinationPropensity ScoreRitonavirAdenosine MonophosphateAgedAlanineFemaleHospitalizationHumansImmunocompromised HostMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirRitonavirCombined treatmentEarly treatmentMonotherapySARS-CoV-2Severe immunocompromised patients

Identifiers

PMID39367485
PMCPMC11451216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.