Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39367579›Full record

ArticleObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

Potential pathways to the onset and development of eating disorders in people with overweight and obesity: A scoping review.

Rabia Khalid, Natalie B Lister, Susan J Paxton, Sarah Maguire, Sol Libesman, Anna L Seidler, Kelly Cooper, Fiona Quigley, Jacqlyn Yourell, Louise A Baur and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Genetic Blueprint of Obesity: From Pathogenesis to Novel Therapies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential pathways to the onset and development of eating disorders in people with overweight and obesity: A scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rabia KhalidChildren's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2653-5834
Natalie B ListerChildren's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Susan J PaxtonSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah MaguireInsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sol LibesmanNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna L SeidlerNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kelly CooperWeight Issues Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona QuigleyInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Belfast, UK.
Jacqlyn YourellDepartment of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Louise A BaurChildren's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Hiba JebeileChildren's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Douglas Burrows Chair of Paediatrics and Child HealthNational Health and Medical Research Council 1145748National Health and Medical Research Council 2009035National Health and Medical Research Council 2009432National Health and Medical Research Council 2017139National Health and Medical Research Council 2022284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe pathways to eating disorder (ED) development that have been evaluated in people with overweight and obesity.

methodsFour databases were searched to identify studies testing ED development models in adolescents (10-19 years) or adults (>19 years) with overweight and obesity. Explanatory variables were thematically grouped into constructs to describe pathways to each ED outcome.

resultsOf 2226 studies screened, 46 (10 adolescent; 36 adult) were included. Study samples were predominantly female, ranging from 22 to 2236 participants and mean age 12.3 to 56.0 years. In total, 207 explanatory variables were grouped into 18 constructs to summarize 107 pathways that were identified. The most common ED outcome was binge eating (n = 24 studies), followed by global ED psychopathology (n = 10 studies). Across pathways to ED development, negative affect was the most proposed construct, followed by preoccupation with weight/shape and weight stigma.

conclusionPathways to ED development in people with overweight and obesity are complex and may include more than 18 different explanatory factors of which negative affect, preoccupation with weight/shape, and weight stigma are the most common. More research on adolescents, males, and the spectrum of ED in diverse populations is required for early identification and intervention.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersObesityOverweightAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaledisordered eatingeating disorder pathwaysobesity treatmentpredictorsrisk factorsweight management

Identifiers

PMID39367579
PMCPMC11611440

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.