ArticlePaediatric drugs2024
Adverse Event Profile of First-line Drugs for Treating Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Neonates: A Disproportionality Analysis Study of USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Article in Paediatric drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug Safety Signals for Pediatric Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Disproportionality Analysis of USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Current pediatric reviews · 2026Article
- Hemorrhage risk associated with triple antithrombotic therapy: a focused real-world pharmacovigilance disproportional analysis study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Drug-associated gingival disorders: a retrospective pharmacovigilance assessment using disproportionality analysis.BDJ open · 2025Article
- Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Preterm Infants: Update on Current Diagnostic and Treatment Options.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Antiplatelet-Proton Pump Inhibitor Interactions and Arterial Thrombotic Events: A Pharmacovigilance Assessment using Disproportionality and Interaction Analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcetaminophen, ibuprofen, and indomethacin are widely used as first-line drugs for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure in preterm neonates. However, their relative safety profiles remain unclear.
methodsAdverse event reports related to the first-line drugs used in PDA and neonates in general were retrieved from the US Food and Drug Authority (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System. Deduplicated reports were analyzed using proportional reporting ratios and reporting odds ratios to identify disproportionality safety signals between drugs.
resultsA total of 969 unique reports related to the first-line drugs used in PDA and 499 reports in the neonatal period were included. Acetaminophen signals primarily involved the liver, while ibuprofen and indomethacin signals pertained to gastrointestinal, renal, vascular, and mortality outcomes. Higher occurrences of death were reported with indomethacin and ibuprofen compared with acetaminophen.
conclusionThis first comparison of PDA drug safety profiles from spontaneous reports highlights some differences, with acetaminophen potentially conferring a safer adverse effect profile overall. While limitations include missing data and reporting biases, the signals warrant further validation. Given its comparable efficacy to ibuprofen, as demonstrated in other studies, acetaminophen has the potential to be preferred as an initial medical therapy for PDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39367998What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.