ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024
The molecular impact of sonoporation: A transcriptomic analysis of gene regulation profile.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioeffects of ultrasonics in environmental and medical applications.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sonoporation has long been known to disrupt intracellular signaling, yet the involved molecules and pathways have not been identified with clarity. In this study, we employed whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) to profile sonoporation-induced gene responses after membrane resealing has taken place. Sonoporation was achieved by microbubble-mediated ultrasound (MB-US) exposure in the form of 1 MHz ultrasound pulsing (0.50 MPa peak negative pressure, 10 % duty cycle, 30 s exposure period) in the presence of microbubbles (1:1 cell-to-bubble ratio). Using propidium iodide (PI) and calcein respectively as cell viability and cytoplasmic uptake labels, post-exposure flow cytometry was performed to identify three viable cell populations: 1) unsonoporated cells, 2) sonoporated cells with low uptake, and 3) sonoporated cells with high uptake. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was then conducted to separate the different groups followed by RNA-seq analysis of the gene expressions in each group of cells. We found that sonoporated cells with low or high calcein uptake showed high similarity in the gene responses, including the activation of multiple heat shock protein (HSP) genes and immediate early response genes mediating apoptosis and transcriptional regulation. In contrast, unsonoporated cells exhibited a more extensive gene expression alteration that included the activation of more HSP genes and the upregulation of diverse apoptotic mediators. Four oxidative stress-related and three immune-related genes were also differentially expressed in unsonoporated cells. Our results provided new information for understanding the intracellular mobilization in response to sonoporation at the molecular level, including the identification of new molecules in the sonoporation-induced apoptosis regulatory network. Our data also shed light on the innovative therapeutic strategy which could potentially leverage the responses of viable unsonoporated cells as a synergistic effector in the microenvironment to favor tumor treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.