ArticleScientific reports2024
CuO nanoparticles for glioma treatment in vitro and in vivo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of nanoparticles green-formulated by Lycium barbarum leaf aqueous extract in the treatment of myocardial infarction.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Anti-inflammatory role of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a review of toxicity, green synthesis, and immunomodulatory mechanisms.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Role of matrix metalloproteinases in the invasion of glioblastoma and drug interventions (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Nano-Drug Delivery Systems Targeting MMPs: A Promising Treatment for Gliomas.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioma is the most prevalent malignant brain tumor in adults. The development of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) has led to the emergence of innovative therapeutic strategies for gliomas. Therefore, our aim is to investigate the therapeutic effect of CuO nanoparticles (NPs) on glioma and provide data support for future research. The therapeutic effect of CuO NPs on glioma rats was explored through the detection of inflammatory factors, oxidase, pathological sections, immunofluorescence, neurotransmitter, glioma biomarker proteins and genes, and rat behavioral tests. Additionally, the application prospect of CuO NPs was evaluated by treating U87MG human glioma cell line. In this study, it was found that CuO NPs can alleviate the inflammatory reaction in the hippocampus tissue of glioma rats, promote the production of ·OH and lead to the up-regulation of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activities. Treatment with CuO NPs also inhibited the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) biomarkers in model rats and glioma cells. Moreover, it enhanced the release of neurotransmitters, which subsequently improved spatial recognition and memory ability of glioma rats. In conclusion, CuO NPs is a potential glioma treatment for ENMs, but still needs modification and modification strategies to improve its biocompatibility and targeted delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.