ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Artificial intelligence for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: a review.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of large language models for generating CAD-RADS 2.0-compliant diagnostic conclusions in cardiac CT reports.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in imaging diagnosis of liver tumors: current status and future prospects.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Practical Considerations in Abdominal MRI: Sequences, Patient Preparation, and Clinical Applications.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal liver lesions (FLL) are common incidental findings in abdominal imaging. While the majority of FLLs are benign and asymptomatic, some can be malignant or pre-malignant, and need accurate detection and classification. Current imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), play a crucial role in assessing these lesions. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), offers potential solutions by analyzing large data to identify patterns and extract clinical features that aid in the early detection and classification of FLLs. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic capacity of AI-based algorithms in processing CT and MRIs to detect benign and malignant FLLs, with an emphasis in the characterization and classification of these lesions and focusing on differentiating benign from pre-malignant and potentially malignant lesions. A comprehensive literature search from January 2010 to April 2024 identified 45 relevant studies. The majority of AI systems employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs), with expert radiologists providing reference standards through manual lesion delineation, and histology as the gold standard. The studies reviewed indicate that AI-based algorithms demonstrate high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUCs in detecting and characterizing FLLs. These algorithms excel in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions, optimizing diagnostic protocols, and reducing the needs of invasive procedures. Future research should concentrate on the expansion of data sets, the improvement of model explainability, and the validation of AI tools across a range of clinical setting to ensure the applicability and reliability of such tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39369107What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.