ArticleBMC health services research2024
Applicability of a digital health application for cancer patients: a qualitative non-participation analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of digital health applications (German acronym DiGA) for comprehensive patient care is increasing rapidly. Patients with non-organic insomnia can be prescribed an application to manage insomnia. Due to the high prevalence of insomnia in patients with cancer, we were interested in the effect of it and what barriers need to be overcome for its use. The focus of existing studies on acceptance and benefits prompted us to emphasise the analysis of barriers and thus to formulate possible solutions.
methodsTo analyse the barriers of use, the study population (patients with self-reported tiredness or sleep disturbance via validated instruments and cancer disease) was divided into 3 groups. In groups 1 (patients who refused to participate in advance) and 2 (patients who refused a prescription), short close-ended questionnaires were used for non-response assessment by treating oncologists. Problem-centred guidelines were used for the telephone interviews with group 3 (patients who did not provide information on DiGA use). Alternatively, group 3 was invited to complete and return the close-ended questionnaire. A quantitative analysis of the non-response reasons was conducted using SPSS in groups 1 and 2, while MAXQDA was used for the qualitative data in group 3.
resultsPatients refused to participate at several stages of our study. Quantitative data are available for groups 1 and 2. In the largest group 1, 62% of patients refused to participate due to non-subjective sleep disturbance (177 out of 189 patients) during recruitment by treating oncologists, despite high scores on the screening tool. In the small group 2 (11 out of 15), the most common reasons for withdrawal documented by the oncologists were loss of interest and deteriorating health. The problem-centred qualitative interviews with group 3 (17 patients) revealed that some of them used the prescribed DiGA, despite not being included in the main study and being categorized as lost to follow-up.
conclusionAnalysis of barriers to DiGA use showed that reducing administrative barriers and providing digital and personal support can increase acceptance of the use of DiGAs among cancer patients. Additionally, screening tools can act as a door opener to further communication regarding DiGAs.
trial registrationGerman Register of Clinical Trials DRKS00034198, registration date: 7/05/24 (retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.