SynthesisCurrent nutrition reports2024
Ultra-processed Food Intake During Pregnancy and its Impact on Maternal Diet Quality and Weight Change: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.
Synthesis in Current nutrition reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between the dietary obesity-prevention score and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: an exploratory subgroup analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Ultra-Processed Foods and Childhood Obesity: Current evidence and perspectives.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- NOTCH1 and UPR signaling in embryonic heart development under maternal high-fat diet influence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdequate and balanced nutrition during pregnancy is essential for both the mother's and fetus's health. The increased dietary intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and their significant share in the diet negatively affects diet quality and gestational weight gain during pregnancy. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the association of UPFs consumption with diet quality and gestational weight change among healthy pregnant women, using data from observational studies (PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023468269) from the last 10 years. RECENT
findingsA search was performed in Pubmed, Wiley, Scopus, and Web of Science, and studies published in english language were selected. Study selection and data extraction were made by determining the exclusion and eligible inclusion criterias according to the PECOS framework. Of the 12 studies included, 5 were longitudinal cohort studies and 7 were cross-sectional studies. On average, half of the energy in the participants' daily diets came from UPFs in 3 studies, but the energy share of UPFs was about 20-30% in the remainder studies. UPFs-enriched maternal diet was associated with less dietary intake of legumes, vegetables, fruits and protein sources (seafood and plant protein, total protein) and greater consumption of refined grains compared to those who consume less UPFs. In parallel, UPFs consumption was negatively associated with Healthy Eating Index. UPF intake during pregnancy has a negative impact on diet quality and gestational weight gain. Increasing awareness of UPFs during this period may reduce potential complications during pregnancy and fetal growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39370494What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.