Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39370594›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2025

GWASBrewer: An R Package for Simulating Realistic GWAS Summary Statistics.

Jean Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jean MorrisonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4829-8283

Funding

Mendelian randomization for modern data: Integrating data resources to improve accuracy of causal estimates.R01HG013104 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jean V. Morrison · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG013104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many statistical genetics analysis methods make use of GWAS summary statistics. Best statistical practice requires evaluating these methods in realistic simulation experiments. However, simulating summary statistics by first simulating individual genotype and phenotype data is extremely computationally demanding. This high cost may force researchers to conduct overly simplistic simulations that fail to accurately measure method performance. Alternatively, summary statistics can be simulated directly from their theoretical distribution. Although this is a common need among statistical genetics researchers, no software packages exist for comprehensive GWAS summary statistic simulation. We present GWASBrewer, an open source R package for direct simulation of GWAS summary statistics. We show that statistics simulated by GWASBrewer have the same distribution as statistics generated from individual level data, and can be produced at a fraction of the computational expense. Additionally, GWASBrewer can simulate standard error estimates, something that is typically not done when sampling summary statistics directly. GWASBrewer is highly flexible, allowing the user to simulate data for multiple traits connected by causal effects and with complex distributions of effect sizes. We demonstrate example uses of GWASBrewer for evaluating Mendelian randomization, polygenic risk score, and heritability estimation methods.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritanceSoftwareGenotypeHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideevaluationGWAS summary statisticsmendelian randomizationpolygenic risk scoresimulation

Identifiers

PMID39370594
PMCPMC11656154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.