Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39371600›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2024

Electrical stimulation: a potential alternative to positively impact cerebral health?

Maël Descollonges, Rémi Chaney, Philippe Garnier, Anne Prigent-Tessier, Julien V Brugniaux, Gaëlle Deley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maël Descollonges *INSERM UMR 1093 - Laboratoire CAPS, « Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice », Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Rémi Chaney *INSERM UMR 1093 - Laboratoire CAPS, « Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice », Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Philippe GarnierINSERM UMR 1093 - Laboratoire CAPS, « Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice », Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Anne Prigent-TessierINSERM UMR 1093 - Laboratoire CAPS, « Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice », Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Julien V Brugniaux *INSERM UMR 1300 - Laboratoire HP2, University Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Gaëlle Deley *INSERM UMR 1093 - Laboratoire CAPS, « Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice », Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing body of evidence confirms the effectiveness of physical exercise (PE) in promoting brain health by preventing age-related cognitive decline and reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. The benefits of PE are attributed to neuroplasticity processes which have been reported to enhance cerebral health. However, moderate to high-intensity PE is necessary to induce these responses and these intensities cannot always be achieved especially by people with physical limitations. As a countermeasure, electrical stimulation (ES) offers several benefits, particularly for improving physical functions, for various neurological diseases. This review aims to provide an overview of key mechanisms that could contribute to the enhancement in brain health in response to ES-induced exercise, including increases in cerebral blood flow, neuronal activity, and humoral pathways. This narrative review also focuses on the effects of ES protocols, applied to both humans and animals, on cognition. Despite a certain paucity of research when compared to the more classical aerobic exercise, it seems that ES could be of interest for improving cerebral health, particularly in people who have difficulty engaging in voluntary exercise.

Indexed as

cerebral blood flowcognitionfunctional electrical stimulationhumoral pathwayneuromuscular electrical stimulationneuronal activityneuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID39371600
PMCPMC11450234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.