ArticleBioelectricity2024
Electroporation in Cancer Therapy: A Simplified Model Derived from the Hodgkin-Huxley Model.
Article in Bioelectricity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a global health challenge, necessitating effective treatments with fewer side effects. Traditional methods such as chemotherapy and surgery often have complications. Pulsed electric fields and electroporation have emerged as promising approaches to mitigate these challenges. This study presents a comprehensive overview of electroporation as an innovative tool in cancer therapy, encompassing critical elements such as pulse generators and delivery devices. Furthermore, it introduces a simplified reversible electroporation model grounded in the Hodgkin-Huxley model. This model ensures resting potential stability by regulating ionic currents. When membrane charges reach the electroporation threshold, the model swiftly increases the fraction of open pores, resulting in a rapid rise in electroporation current. Conversely, as the transmembrane potential drops below the threshold, the model gradually reduces the fraction of open pores, leading to a gradual decline in electroporation current, indicating pore resealing. This model contributes to easier modeling and implementation of reversible electroporation dynamics, providing a valuable tool for further exploration of electroporation for cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.