ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Neural dynamics of reversal learning in the prefrontal cortex and recurrent neural networks.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In probabilistic reversal learning, the choice option yielding reward with higher probability switches at a random trial. To perform optimally in this task, one has to accumulate evidence across trials to infer the probability that a reversal has occurred. We investigated how this reversal probability is represented in cortical neurons by analyzing the neural activity in the prefrontal cortex of monkeys and recurrent neural networks trained on the task. We found that in a neural subspace encoding reversal probability, its activity represented integration of reward outcomes as in a line attractor model. The reversal probability activity at the start of a trial was stationary, stable and consistent with the attractor dynamics. However, during the trial, the activity was associated with task-related behavior and became non-stationary, thus deviating from the line attractor. Fitting a predictive model to neural data showed that the stationary state at the trial start serves as an initial condition for launching the non-stationary activity. This suggested an extension of the line attractor model with behavior-induced non-stationary dynamics. The non-stationary trajectories were separable indicating that they can represent distinct probabilistic values. Perturbing the reversal probability activity in the recurrent neural networks biased choice outcomes demonstrating its functional significance. In sum, our results show that cortical networks encode reversal probability in stable stationary state at the start of a trial and utilize it to initiate non-stationary dynamics that accommodates task-related behavior while maintaining the reversal information.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.