ArticleDigital health
Automatic selection model to identify neurodegenerative diseases.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing biomedical data analytics using explainable neural network-based learning model for progressive neurodegenerative disorder diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine-Driven Modulation of the Gut-Brain Axis: Innovative Approaches to Managing Chronic Inflammation in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates machine learning algorithms' effectiveness in classifying Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease based on biomarker data obtained non-invasively from patients and healthy controls. Methods: Datasets containing biomarker data ( Results: The study achieved a 0.893 precision rate for Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease using the random subspace method. The findings underscore the potential of machine learning techniques in medical diagnosis, particularly in neurological disorders. Conclusion: The automatic selection model method demonstrated efficacy in classifying Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease based on non-invasive biomarker data. This research contributes to advancing non-invasive diagnostic approaches in neurological disorders, highlighting the significance of machine learning in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.