Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39375429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Detection and isolation of brain tumors in cancer patients using neural network techniques in MRI images.

Mahdi Mir, Zaid Saad Madhi, Ali Hamid AbdulHussein, Mohammed Khodayer Hassan Al Dulaimi, Muath Suliman, Ahmed Alkhayyat, Ali Ihsan, Lihng Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mahdi MirDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. Mahdimir.ir@gmail.com.
Zaid Saad MadhiDepartment of Optics Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, 51001, Hilla, Babylon, Iraq.
Ali Hamid AbdulHusseinDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Al-Ameed, Karbala, Iraq.
Mohammed Khodayer Hassan Al DulaimiDepartment of Computer Science, Al Rafidain University College, Bagdad, Iraq.
Muath SulimanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AlkhayyatCollege of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Ali IhsanDepartment of Medical Laboratories Techniques, Imam Ja'afar Al-Sadiq University, Al-Muthanna, 66002, Iraq.
Lihng LuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Heyang Normal University, Heyang, Huan, 420012, China, Heyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI imaging primarily focuses on the soft tissues of the human body, typically performed prior to a patient's transfer to the surgical suite for a medical procedure. However, utilizing MRI images for tumor diagnosis is a time-consuming process. To address these challenges, a new method for automatic brain tumor diagnosis was developed, employing a combination of image segmentation, feature extraction, and classification techniques to isolate the specific region of interest in an MRI image corresponding to a brain tumor. The proposed method in this study comprises five distinct steps. Firstly, image pre-processing is conducted, utilizing various filters to enhance image quality. Subsequently, image thresholding is applied to facilitate segmentation. Following segmentation, feature extraction is performed, analyzing morphological and structural properties of the images. Then, feature selection is carried out using principal component analysis (PCA). Finally, classification is performed using an artificial neural network (ANN). In total, 74 unique features were extracted from each image, resulting in a dataset of 144 observations. Principal component analysis was employed to select the top 8 most effective features. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) leverage comprehensive data and selective knowledge. Consequently, the proposed approach was evaluated and compared with alternative methods, resulting in significant improvements in precision, accuracy, and F1 score. The proposed method demonstrated notable increases in accuracy, with improvements of 99.3%, 97.3%, and 98.5% in accuracy, Sensitivity and F1 score. These findings highlight the efficiency of this approach in accurately segmenting and classifying MRI images.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPrincipal Component AnalysisMRI imageNeural networkPatient isolationTumor detection

Identifiers

PMID39375429
PMCPMC11458613

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.